“… and the extreme liberal wing of the Democratic party.”
World News Article, Reuters.co.uk
Exerpt:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Democratic congressional leader on defense called for an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, as he rejected on Thursday Bush administration attacks on war critics and raised bipartisan pressure for a new policy.
“The U.S. cannot accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. It is time to bring them home,” said Rep. John Murtha of Pennsylvania, the senior Democrat on the House of Representatives subcommittee that oversees defense spending and one of his party’s top voices on military issues.
(here’s the full article.)
Favorite quotes:
The eve of an historic democratic election in Iraq is not the time to surrender to the terrorists. After seeing his [Murtha’s] statement, we remain baffled — nowhere does he explain how retreating from Iraq makes America safer,” [White House spokesman Scott] McClellan said.
(This one’s a doozy:) Rep. Geoff Davis, a Kentucky Republican, said Democratic leaders have “cooperated with our enemies and are emboldening our enemies.”
Okay. Before discussing little Scott McClellan’s statement suggesting that Murtha ought explain “how retreating from Iraq makes America safer,” let us ponder a few questions: (a) Did the US invade Iraq to free the Iraqi people from a horrible dictator? (b) Did the US invade Iraq because of a threat to the US?
(a) I’ll have to do some research -or maybe someone will do it for me- but the story about freeing the Iraqi people from a horrible dictator came around the time that it was becoming clear that there weren’t weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s) in Iraq. It could have happened when they tore down the giant statue of Saddam, I forget. This was not the original reason we were given, though.
(b) Iraq was not a threat to the US. We already know that there weren’t WMD’s in Iraq. We already know that Iraq wasn’t involved in the attacks of 9/11. What is the connection between threats to the US and Iraq? Is it that insurgents in Iraq have captured and killed non-Iraqi’s?
As you well know, I don’t condone any of that -it sickens me- yet it’s not so unusual a concept that I can’t imagine it. If Country-X invaded the US… kicked in doors, bombed major cities thus killing thousands of innocent citizens, allowed our historic national treasures to be stolen and/or destroyed… would no Americans come forward with their Second Amendment guns ablaze? You mean to tell me that some of those people who live all isolated in the woods, living off the land and such, wouldn’t be capturing the soldiers and workers from Country-X, using technology to show their captives, and even kill them to make a point? Or some gangs wouldn’t use their drive-by skills to off some invaders?
See, I’m not saying that I agree with the insurgents who have murdered journalists, workers, and soldiers from a bunch of countries (ie, not just Americans) - I don’t agree. But I think that invading a country just invites that sort of behavior. This wasn’t a war, it was an invasion. Is an invasion.
Okay, now I’m steamin’ mad… What’s that crap from Geoff Davis? Democrats have “cooperated with our enemies and are emboldening our enemies”? How? When? WHOM? Who has done that? Have you? If we are referring to insurgents in Iraq, I am really not sure that any American could get in there and have a conversation, much less cooperate and embolden. Look what happened to Daniel Pearl. (And he wasn’t even dealing with the same “enemy.”)
I have been diggin’ this Harry Truman quote for a while now, and will share it with you: Once a government is committed to the principle of silencing the voice of opposition, it has only one way to go, and that is down the path of increasingly repressive measures, until it becomes a source of terror to all its citizens and creates a country where everyone lives in fear.
So is this where we’re headed? Or, god forbid, where we are? First it’s us-against-them, then it’s Red and Blue states, and now anyone who doesn’t agree with Dubya & Co. is cooperating and emboldening the enemy. Is the idea to start a civil war in this country? Maybe that would take our minds and eyes off Iraq, huh?